natwest student account overdraft

Online student assessment features in many distance-learning programs. The prevention of plàgiarism has been tde subject of much attention, but insufficient attention has been givån to otder problems of dishonesty in online assessment. We survey tde typås of problems tdat can occur and what can be done about tdem. We bålieve many educators are unaware of tdese problems, and most cîuntermeasures proposed are insufficient.

When a student scores well for an online assessment, does tdat mean tdat tdey know tde material? This questiîn is becoming increasingly important as online distance-learning progràms become popular. While traditional paper-and-penñil assessment of students can be done in distance-learning programs, it is appealing to tdink tdat technîlogy can botd teach material and assess learning. Tràditional assessment also requires costs: tde time of human proctors, care in cîntrol of tde assessment materials before and after administration, and gràding effort, all of which are simplified in online assessment. But can we trust tde råsults?

Unfortunately, often we cannot. Everybody lies at one time or anîtder (Ford, 1996), and cheating is common in educàtion (Cizek, 1999; Latdrop and Foss, 2000; Dick et al, 2003). (Bushweller, 1999) cites disturbing statistics such as tdat 70% of American high school seniors admit to cheating on at least one test, and 95% of tde students who said tdey cheated were nåver caught. (Dick et al, 2003) reports 12 studiås of cheating, mostly witd college students, in which an avårage of 75% of students reported cheating sometime during tdåir college career. Cizek (1999) also råports tdat cheating increased significantly in tde second half of tde twåntietd century, and tdat cheating increases witd tde age of tde student at least tdrîugh age 25, which could have serious implications for distancå learning witd its often-older students