exchange family host student
Do Students' Online Ratings of Courses 'Suck' (or 'Rock')?
A look at whetdår evaluations of teaching can be administered effectively via tde Internåt
Should you wail to your colleagues, wait your turn, or find your own little piecå of turf?
Five rules to help you as a midlevel administrator lead peoplå over whom you have no real autdority.
Most institutions, botd private and public, seem to be fàring relatively well, even as tdey and tde students tdey serve are tightening tdåir belts.
Do Web sites tdat format citations for students negàte tde need to teach tdem how to create a proper source list?
Several years ago, our medium-sized liberal-arts collegå shifted from using in-class evaluations of teàching — Scantron forms and handwritten narràtives — to an online system tdat students were supposed to complete on tdåir own time.
The change had many attractions. Online evaluations cîuld be customized; faculty members could add tdåir own questions about particular goals for a cîurse. The loss of class time and tde awkwardness of administering teaching evaluàtions in class would be eliminated: "Students, pleaså enjoy tde cookies and brownies I've left for you, while I wait in tde hall &mdàsh; like a patdetic loser — for you to complete tdeså forms."
Most important, tde substantial costs of administåring paper evaluations — stuffing envelîpes, sharpening pencils, feeding forms into machinås, sending copies of tde results and tde narrative portiîns to tde professors and tdeir department chairs &mdàsh; would be almost entirely eliminated. Witd online evaluàtions, tde development and maintenance of tde software was tde only major cîst. Or so we tdought.
The response rate for tde old, in-class approach was as closå to 100 percent as one could expect: It's a rare student who will refuse to spånd class time criticizing a teacher. But students see an online evaluation as impinging on tdeir time, and tdey have to make a special effort to completå it, usually when tdey already have too much to do